The Guinea EquityTool country factsheet and file downloads on this page are licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0
Source data: Guinea DHS 2012
# of survey questions in original wealth index: 37
# of variables in original index: 113
# of survey questions in EquityTool: 10
# of variables in EquityTool: 15
Questions:
Question | Option 1 | Option 2 | Option 3 | Option 4 | |
Q1 | Does your household have… electricity? | Yes | No | ||
Q2 | A television? | Yes | No | ||
Q3 | A refrigerator? | Yes | No | ||
Q4 | A cupboard/bookcase? | Yes | No | ||
Q5 | Does any member of your household have a bank account? | Yes | No | ||
Q6 | What is the main source of drinking water used by members of your household? | Piped to dwelling | Other | ||
Q7 | What type of toilet do members of your household typically use? | Flush toilet to septic tank | Pit latrine with slab | Traditional pit latrine (no slab) | Other |
Q8 | What is main material of the floor of your dwelling? | Ceramic/ mosaic | Earth/ sand/ gravel | Other | |
Q9 | What is the main material of the exterior walls of your dwelling? | Cane/palm/ trunks/dirt | Stone walls with lime /cement | Cement | Other |
Q10 | What type of fuel does your household mainly use for cooking? | Wood | Other |
Technical notes:
To create the EquityTool, we simplify the original, full wealth index that is found in the relevant DHS dataset. In the case of Guinea DHS 2012, we noticed an error in the original wealth index used in the DHS dataset. The full wealth index was recreated without this error in a process similar to that used originally in the DHS survey, using 113 variables from 37 questions. This recreated wealth index was then simplified to create the EquityTool.
The standard simplification process was applied to achieve high agreement with the full wealth index. Kappa was greater than 0.75 for the national and urban indices. Details on the standard process can be found in this article. The data used to identify important variables comes from the factor weights from the analysis described above.
Level of agreement:
National Population (n=7,109) | Urban only population (n=2,503) | |
% agreement | 84% | 84.2% |
Kappa statistic | 0.75 | 0.753 |
Respondents in the original dataset were divided into three groups for analysis – those in the 1st and 2nd quintiles (poorest 40%), those in the 3rd quintile, and those in the 4th and 5th quintiles (richest 40%). After calculating their wealth using the simplified index, they were again divided into the same three groups for analysis against the original data in the full DHS. Agreement between the original data and our simplified index is presented above.
What does this mean?
When shortening and simplifying the index to make it easier for programs to use to assess equity, it no longer matches the original index with 100% accuracy. At an aggregate level, this error is minimal, and this methodology was deemed acceptable for programmatic use by an expert panel. However, for any given individual, especially those already at a boundary between two quintiles, the quintile the EquityTool assigns them to may differ to their quintile according to the original DHS wealth index.
The graph below illustrates the difference between the EquityTool generated index and the full DHS wealth index. Among all of those people (20% of the population) originally identified as being in the poorest quintile, approximately 80% are still identified as being in the poorest quintile when we use the simplified index. However, approximately 20% of people are now classified as being in Quintiles 2 or 3. From a practical standpoint, all of these people are relatively poor. Yet, it is worthwhile to understand that the simplified index of 10 questions produces results that are not identical to using all 37 questions in the original survey.
The following table provides the same information on the movement between national quintiles when using the EquityTool versus the original DHS wealth index:
EquityTool National Quintiles | |||||||
Quintile 1 | Quintile 2 | Quintile 3 | Quintile 4 | Quintile 5 | Total | ||
Original DHS National Quintiles | Quintile 1 | 15.90% | 2.80% | 1.20% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 20.00% |
Quintile 2 | 8.20% | 8.80% | 2.70% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 20.00% | |
Quintile 3 | 0.20% | 4.10% | 12.30% | 3.30% | 0.00% | 20.00% | |
Quintile 4 | 0.00% | 0.30% | 3.40% | 13.90% | 2.50% | 20.00% | |
Quintile 5 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.50% | 17.50% | 20.00% | |
Total | 24.40% | 16.00% | 19.60% | 20.00% | 20.00% | 100.00% |
The following graph provides information on the movement between urban quintiles when using the EquityTool versus the original DHS wealth index:
The following table provides the same information on the movement between urban quintiles when using the EquityTool versus the original DHS wealth index:
EquityTool Urban Quintiles | |||||||
Quintile 1 | Quintile 2 | Quintile 3 | Quintile 4 | Quintile 5 | Total | ||
Original DHS Urban Quintiles | Quintile 1 | 16.70% | 2.60% | 0.50% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 20.00% |
Quintile 2 | 3.70% | 13.00% | 2.40% | 0.60% | 0.20% | 20.00% | |
Quintile 3 | 0.00% | 3.90% | 12.60% | 3.10% | 0.40% | 20.00% | |
Quintile 4 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.50% | 12.00% | 3.50% | 20.00% | |
Quintile 5 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.50% | 15.50% | 20.00% | |
Total | 20.50% | 19.50% | 20.00% | 20.40% | 19.60% | 100.00% |
Data interpretation considerations:
Metrics for Management provides technical assistance services to those using the EquityTool, or wanting to collect data on the wealth of their program beneficiaries. Please contact equitytool@m4mgmt.org and we will assist you.
[1] From povertydata.worldbank.org, reporting Poverty headcount ratio at $1.90/day at 2011 international prices.
[2] From the Guinea DHS 2012 dataset household recode, available at http://dhsprogram.com/