The Madagascar EquityTool country factsheet and file downloads on this page are licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0
EquityTool: Released May 14, 2018
Source data: Madagascar MIS 2016
# of survey questions in original wealth index: 32
# of variables in original index: 122
# of survey questions in EquityTool: 12
# of variables in EquityTool: 15
Questions:
Question | Option 1 | Option 2 | Option 3 | |
Q1 | Does your household have… Electricity? | Yes | No | |
Q2 | A radio? | Yes | No | |
Q3 | A television? | Yes | No | |
Q4 | A refrigerator? | Yes | No | |
Q5 | Does any member of your household have… a watch? | Yes | No | |
Q6 | A mobile phone? | Yes | No | |
Q7 | A motorcycle/scooter? | Yes | No | |
Q8 | Does anyone in your household have a bank account? | Yes | No | |
Q9 | What is the main material of the floor of your home? | Mat | Cement | Other |
Q10 | What is the main material of the exterior walls in your home? | Cement | Other | |
Q11 | What is the main material of the roof of your home? | Thatch/Palm/Leaves | Metal Sheets | Other |
Q12 | What type of fuel does your household mainly use for cooking? | Charcoal | Wood | Other |
Technical notes:
The standard simplification process was applied to achieve high agreement with the original wealth index. Kappa was greater than 0.75 for the national and urban indices. Details on the standard process can be found in this article. The data used to identify important variables comes from the factor weights released by ICF.
It is important to note that the Madagascar Malaria Indicator Survey (MIS) 2016 is not a nationally representative survey. Areas more than 1500 meters above sea level, and the regions of Antananarivo Renivohitra, Antsirabe 1, and Finarantso were excluded because no malaria transmission occurs in those places in Madagascar. The areas that were not surveyed are indicated by black stripes in the map below (right), adopted from the Madagascar MIS 2016 Final Report, available here. According to that report, the population remaining in the sampling frame for the 2016 MIS represents about 85.7% of the population. The regions of Antananarivo Renivohitra, Antsirabe 1, and Finarantso house the most densely populated urban areas of Madagascar, including the capital, Antananarivo. Urban households were surveyed elsewhere, and those households make up the ‘Urban-only’ sample used to generate the urban wealth index. These urban households were selected from all of the remaining regions of Madagascar, except for Analamanga and Vakinankaratra. The table below provides more information about the distribution of the urban sample throughout the country. When using the Madagascar MIS 2016 EquityTool to calculate urban wealth quintiles, users should carefully consider how the population on which the urban wealth index is based compares to the excluded urban population in Antananarivo Renivohitra, Antsirabe 1, and Finarantso. Furthermore, it is not recommended for you to use the Madagascar MIS 2016 EquityTool if your respondents reside in the excluded urban regions.
Region | Households Surveyed | ||
Urban | Rural | Total | |
Analamanga | — | 487 | 487 |
Vakinankaratra | — | 474 | 474 |
Itasy | 61 | 438 | 499 |
Bongolava | 60 | 439 | 499 |
Haute Matsiatra | 61 | 443 | 504 |
Amoron | Mania | 64 | 442 | 506 |
Vatovavy Fitovinany | 64 | 512 | 576 |
Ihorombe | 64 | 319 | 383 |
Atsimo Atsinanana | 128 | 352 | 480 |
Atsinanana | 97 | 448 | 545 |
Analanjirofo | 128 | 696 | 824 |
Alaotra Mangoro | 94 | 403 | 497 |
Boeny | 184 | 255 | 439 |
Sofia | 65 | 422 | 487 |
Betsiboka | 59 | 409 | 468 |
Melaky | 64 | 352 | 416 |
Atsimo Andrefana | 63 | 492 | 555 |
Androy | 191 | 445 | 636 |
Anosy | 128 | 412 | 540 |
Menabe | 95 | 382 | 477 |
Diana | 223 | 292 | 515 |
Sava | 96 | 381 | 477 |
Madagascar (Total) | 1,989 | 9,295 | 11,284 |
Level of agreement:
National Population (n=11,284) | Urban only population (n=1,989) | |
% agreement | 84.7% | 84.6% |
Kappa statistic | 0.761 | 0.759 |
Respondents in the original dataset were divided into three groups for analysis – those in the 1st and 2nd quintiles (poorest 40%), those in the 3rd quintile, and those in the 4th and 5th quintiles (richest 40%). After calculating their wealth using the simplified index, they were again divided into the same three groups for analysis against the original data in the full DHS. Agreement between the original data and our simplified index is presented above.
What does this mean?
When shortening and simplifying the index to make it easier for programs to use to assess equity, it no longer matches the original index with 100% accuracy. At an aggregate level, this error is minimal, and this methodology was deemed acceptable for programmatic use by an expert panel. However, for any given individual, especially those already at a boundary between two quintiles, the quintile the EquityTool assigns them to may differ to their quintile according to the original DHS wealth index.
The graph below illustrates the difference between the EquityTool generated index and the full DHS wealth index. Among all of those people (20% of the population) originally identified as being in the poorest quintile, approximately 74% are still identified as being in the poorest quintile when we use the simplified index. However, approximately 23.5% of people are now classified as being in Quintile 2. From a practical standpoint, all of these people are relatively poor. Yet, it is worthwhile to understand that the simplified index of 12 questions produces results that are not identical to using all 32 questions in the original survey.
The following table provides the same information on the movement between national quintiles when using the EquityTool versus the original DHS wealth index:
EquityTool National Quintiles | |||||||
Quintile 1 | Quintile 2 | Quintile 3 | Quintile 4 | Quintile 5 | Total | ||
Original DHS National Quintiles | Quintile 1 | 14.80% | 4.70% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.00% |
Quintile 2 | 6.50% | 9.30% | 4.20% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 20.00% | |
Quintile 3 | 0.70% | 3.70% | 12.60% | 3.00% | 0.00% | 20.00% | |
Quintile 4 | 0.00% | 0.10% | 3.00% | 15.60% | 1.20% | 20.00% | |
Quintile 5 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.20% | 18.80% | 20.00% | |
Total | 21.90% | 17.80% | 20.30% | 20.00% | 20.00% | 100.00% |
The following graph provides information on the movement between urban quintiles when using the EquityTool versus the original DHS wealth index:
The following table provides the same information on the movement between urban quintiles when using the EquityTool versus the original DHS wealth index:
EquityTool Urban Quintiles | |||||||
Quintile 1 | Quintile 2 | Quintile 3 | Quintile 4 | Quintile 5 | Total | ||
Original DHS Urban Quintiles | Quintile 1 | 17.20% | 2.60% | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 20.00% |
Quintile 2 | 2.90% | 13.50% | 2.90% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 20.10% | |
Quintile 3 | 0.00% | 4.00% | 12.70% | 3.00% | 0.30% | 20.00% | |
Quintile 4 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.80% | 11.30% | 4.80% | 19.90% | |
Quintile 5 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 4.70% | 15.00% | 20.10% | |
Total | 20.00% | 20.00% | 19.90% | 20.00% | 20.10% | 100.00% |
Data interpretation considerations:
Metrics for Management provides technical assistance services to those using the EquityTool, or wanting to collect data on the wealth of their program beneficiaries. Please contact equitytool@m4mgmt.org and we will assist you.
[1] From povertydata.worldbank.org, reporting Poverty headcount ratio at $1.90/day at 2011 international prices.
[2] From the Madagascar MIS 2016 dataset household recode, available at http://dhsprogram.com/